Sakana AI 发布第三阶段系统 The Agentic Scientist，把 Codex、Claude Code 等现成编码智能体包进一套 scaffold，由它控制智能体看到什么、写什么、如何评估以及结果如何交给下一阶段，覆盖课题设定、假设探索、实验、验证到论文写作。
引用Sakana AI@SakanaAILabs
The Agentic Scientist: Orchestrating Coding Agents for Automated Scientific (Co-)Discovery
Blog: https://pub.sakana.ai/agentic-scientist/
GitHub: https://github.com/SakanaAI/AI-Scientist-v3
arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18933
Since 2024, we’ve used The AI Scientist as a way to test how far AI alone can take scientific research, from v1 to v2 to the paper published in Nature earlier this year. The Agentic Scientist is the next step in that line of work, built for the era of coding agents.
Coding agents such as Codex and Claude Code now carry out long software tasks on their own. Handing them a research problem, however, tends to produce a strong hyperparameter optimizer rather than a scientist: scores go up, but ideas stay narrow, and the reasons for the gain are rarely examined.
The Agentic Scientist makes the research loop explicit. It wraps off-the-shelf coding agents in a scaffold that controls what they see, what they write, how they are evaluated, and how results are handed to the next stage.
Parallel workers test hypotheses against rubrics defined before any experiment runs, share successes and failures through a common memory, and then ablate the winning program to generate evidence.
We used an early version of the system to study Error Diffusion, a biologically motivated alternative to backpropagation. Our researchers set the question and the rubric, chose directions at each stage, and verified the results, references, and claims before submission. The resulting paper was accepted as an oral presentation at ALIFE 2026. In autonomous runs, the system also raised Doc-to-LoRA retrieval accuracy from 52% to 98% on multi-needle tasks and designed a learned evolution strategy that improves over its CMA-ES reference on unseen tasks.
Alongside it we release AutoIllustrate, a pipeline for scientific figures that keeps an editable http://draw.io file as the source of truth, so every diagram can be corrected by hand.
Humans define the question and the standards of evidence; agents expand the experiments researchers can run. We call this Co-Discovery, and we are releasing both systems as open source for the community to build on.