We mapped funding raised vs founder citations across 32 neo-labs
摘要
我们梳理了32家新实验室（neo-labs）的融资额与创始人引用量 它们的创始团队累计获得835万次引用，融资总额近260亿美元 Discovery Loop以159万次创始人引用领先，其次是SSI（91.5万）和AMI Labs（75.2万） 两者存在相关性，但高引用量显然并非成为新实验室的先决条件（参见Standard Intelligence和Flapping Airplanes）
摘要由模型根据原文撰写，以原文为准。
正文 · 原文
We mapped funding raised vs founder citations across 32 neo-labs
Their founding teams have amassed 8.35M citations and have raised nearly $26B
Discovery Loop leads with 1.59M founder citations, followed by SSI (915K) and AMI Labs (752K)
The two are correlated, but a huge citation count certainly isn’t a prerequisite to be a neo-lab (see Standard Intelligence and Flapping Airplanes)
来源：alphaXiv · x.com
引用原文
askalphaxiv. We mapped funding raised vs founder citations across 32 neo-labs[EB/OL]. (2026-11-07)[访问日期]. https://x.com/askalphaxiv/status/2119073134728900831.