跳到正文

RobPicker:用于冷冻电子断层图像中大分子稳健识别的元学习框架

RobPicker: a meta-learning framework for robust identification of macromolecules in cryo-electron tomograms

摘要

研究提出 RobPicker 元学习框架,用于在冷冻电子断层图像(cryo-ET)中识别大分子。作者同时公开了配套数据集与源代码(均存于 Zenodo),论文发表于 Nature 旗下方法学期刊。该框架面向 cryo-ET 数据中分子模式识别这一结构生物学数据处理环节。

摘要由模型根据原文撰写,以原文为准。

正文 · 原文

  1. Beck, M. & Baumeister, W. Cryo-electron tomography: can it reveal the molecular sociology of cells in atomic detail?. Trends Cell Biol. 26, 825–837 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahamid, J. et al. Visualizing the molecular sociology at the HeLa cell nuclear periphery. Science 351, 969–972 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McCafferty, C. L. et al. Integrating cellular electron microscopy with multimodal data to explore biology across space and time. Cell 187, 563–584 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nogales, E. & Mahamid, J. Bridging structural and cell biology with cryo-electron microscopy. Nature 628, 47–56 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cai, S. et al. Cryo-ET reveals the macromolecular reorganization of S. pombe mitotic chromosomes in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 115, 10977–10982 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, C.-Y. et al. In situ structure and dynamics of an alphacoronavirus spike protein by cryo-ET and cryo-EM. Nat. Commun. 13, 4877 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pyle, E., Miller, E. A. & Zanetti, G. Cryo-electron tomography reveals how COPII assembles on cargo-containing membranes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 32, 513–519 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lučić, V., Rigort, A. & Baumeister, W. Cryo-electron tomography: the challenge of doing structural biology in situ. J. Cell Biol. 202, 407–419 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Berger, C. et al. Cryo-electron tomography on focused ion beam lamellae transforms structural cell biology. Nat. Methods 20, 499–511 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisenstein, F. et al. Parallel cryo electron tomography on in situ lamellae. Nat. Methods 20, 131–138 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pyle, E. & Zanetti, G. Current data processing strategies for cryo-electron tomography and subtomogram averaging. Biochem. J. 478, 1827–1845 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Watson, A. J. I. & Bartesaghi, A. Advances in cryo-ET data processing: meeting the demands of visual proteomics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 87, 102861 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, M. et al. A complete data processing workflow for cryo-ET and subtomogram averaging. Nat. Methods 16, 1161–1168 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Eisenstein, F., Fukuda, Y. & Danev, R. Smart parallel automated cryo-electron tomography. Nat. Methods 21, 1612–1615 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Iudin, A., Korir, P. K., Torres, J., Kleywegt, G. J. & Patwardhan, A. EMPIAR: a public archive for raw electron microscopy image data. Nat. Methods 13, 387–388 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao, S. et al. Macromolecules structural classification with a 3D dilated dense network in cryo-electron tomography. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 19, 209–219 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeng, Y. et al. Unsupervised domain alignment based open set structural recognition of macromolecules captured by cryo-electron tomography. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 106–110 (IEEE, 2021).

  18. Lamm, L. et al. MemBrain: a deep learning-aided pipeline for detection of membrane proteins in cryo-electron tomograms. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 224, 106990 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeng, X. et al. High-throughput cryo-ET structural pattern mining by unsupervised deep iterative subtomogram clustering. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2213149120 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Moebel, E. et al. Deep learning improves macromolecule identification in 3D cellular cryo-electron tomograms. Nat. Methods 18, 1386–1394 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. de Teresa-Trueba, I. et al. Convolutional networks for supervised mining of molecular patterns within cellular context. Nat. Methods 20, 284–294 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, G. et al. DeepETPicker: fast and accurate 3D particle picking for cryo-electron tomography using weakly supervised deep learning. Nat. Commun. 15, 2090 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Çiçek, Ö., Abdulkadir, A., Lienkamp, S. S., Brox, T. & Ronneberger, O. 3D U-Net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2016: 19th International Conference, Proceedings, Part II (eds Ourselin, S. et al.) 424–432 (Springer, 2016).

  24. Moebel, E. & Kervrann, C. Towards unsupervised classification of macromolecular complexes in cryo electron tomography: challenges and opportunities. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 225, 107017 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rice, G. et al. TomoTwin: generalized 3D localization of macromolecules in cryo-electron tomograms with structural data mining. Nat. Methods 20, 871–880 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Yan, R., Venkatakrishnan, S. V., Liu, J., Bouman, C. A. & Jiang, W. MBIR: a cryo-ET 3D reconstruction method that effectively minimizes missing wedge artifacts and restores missing information. J. Struct. Biol. 206, 183–192 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Turk, M. & Baumeister, W. The promise and the challenges of cryo-electron tomography. FEBS Lett. 594, 3243–3261 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bepler, T., Kelley, K., Noble, A. J. & Berger, B. Topaz-Denoise: general deep denoising models for cryoEM and cryoET. Nat. Commun. 11, 5208 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu, Y.-T. et al. Isotropic reconstruction for electron tomography with deep learning. Nat. Commun. 13, 6482 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, H. et al. A method for restoring signals and revealing individual macromolecule states in cryo-ET, REST. Nat. Commun. 14, 2937 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wiedemann, S. & Heckel, R. A deep learning method for simultaneous denoising and missing wedge reconstruction in cryogenic electron tomography. Nat. Commun. 15, 8255 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, M. et al. Convolutional neural networks for automated annotation of cellular cryo-electron tomograms. Nat. Methods 14, 983–985 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Böhm, J. et al. Toward detecting and identifying macromolecules in a cellular context: template matching applied to electron tomograms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 14245–14250 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wagner, T. & Raunser, S. The evolution of SPHIRE-crYOLO particle picking and its application in automated cryo-EM processing workflows. Commun. Biol. 3, 61 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Cruz-León, S. et al. High-confidence 3D template matching for cryo-electron tomography. Biophys. J. 123, 183a (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ermel, U. et al. A data portal for providing standardized annotations for cryo-electron tomography. Nat. Methods 21, 2200–2202 (2024).

  37. Huang, Q., Zhou, Y. & Bartesaghi, A. MiLoPYP: self-supervised molecular pattern mining and particle localization in situ. Nat. Methods 21, 1863–1872 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Stojanovska, F. et al. CryoSiam: self-supervised representation learning for automated analysis of cryo-electron tomograms. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.11.687379. (2025).

  39. Bandyopadhyay, H. et al. Cryo-shift: reducing domain shift in cryo-electron subtomograms with unsupervised domain adaptation and randomization. Bioinformatics 38, 977–984 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Harastani, M., Patra, G., Kervrann, C. & Eltsov, M. Template learning: deep learning with domain randomization for particle picking in cryo-electron tomography. Nat. Commun. 16, 8833 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Luo, Z., Zeng, X., Bao, Z., & Xu, M., Deep learning-based strategy for macromolecules classification with imbalanced data from cellular electron cryotomography. In 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 1–8 (IEEE, 2019).

  42. Zhao, R. et al. Rethinking Dice Loss for medical image segmentation. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining 851–860 (IEEE, 2020).

  43. Yeung, M., Sala, E., Schönlieb, C.-B. & Rundo, L. Unified focal loss: generalising Dice and cross entropy-based losses to handle class imbalanced medical image segmentation. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 95, 102026 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Li, Z., Kamnitsas, K. & Glocker, B. Analyzing overfitting under class imbalance in neural networks for image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 40, 1065–1077 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hospedales, T., Antoniou, A., Micaelli, P. & Storkey, A. Meta-learning in neural networks: a survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 44, 5149–5169 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Harrington, K. et al. CZII - CryoET object identification. Kaggle https://kaggle.com/competitions/czii-cryo-et-object-identification (2024).

  47. Zheng, G., Awadallah, A. H. & Dumais, S. Meta label correction for noisy label learning. In Proc. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence Vol. 35, 11053–11061 (AAAI, 2021).

  48. Gubins, I. et al. SHREC 2020: classification in cryo-electron tomograms. Comput. Graph. 91, 279–289 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Shu, J. et al. Meta-weight-net: learning an explicit mapping for sample weighting. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 32 (eds Wallach, H. et al.) (Curran Associates, 2019).

  50. Chaillet, M. L., Roet, S., Veltkamp, R. C. & Förster, F. pytom-match-pick: a tophat-transform constraint for automated classification in template matching. J. Struct. Biol. 11, 100125 (2025).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Burt, A. et al. An image processing pipeline for electron cryo-tomography in RELION-5. FEBS Open Bio. 14, 1788–1804 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Tegunov, D., Xue, L., Dienemann, C., Cramer, P. & Mahamid, J. Multi-particle cryo-EM refinement with M visualizes ribosome–antibiotic complex at 3.5 Å in cells. Nat. Methods 18, 186–193 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Dice, L. R. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26, 297–302 (1945).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu, H., Simonyan, K. & Yang, Y. DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Search. In International Conference on Learning Representations (OpenReview.net, 2019).

  55. Choe, S. K., Neiswanger, W., Xie, P. & Xing, E. Betty: an automatic differentiation library for multilevel optimization. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations (OpenReview.net, 2023).

  56. Paszke, A. et al. PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Vol. 32 (eds Wallach, H. et al.) (Curran Associates, 2019).

  57. Ioffe, S. & Szegedy, C. Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Bach, F. & Blei, D.) 448–456 (PMLR, 2015).

  58. Nair, V. & Hinton, G. E. Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In Proc. 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10) (eds Fürnkranz, J. & Joachims, T.) 807–814 (Omnipress, 2010).

  59. Henkel, C., & Khvedchenya, E., CZII - 1st place solution. Kaggle https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/czii-cryo-et-object-identification/writeups/daddies-1st-place-solution-segmentation-with-partl (accessed 17 November 2025).

  60. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 770–778 (IEEE, 2016).

  61. Zhang, H., Cisse, M., Dauphin, Y. N. & Lopez-Paz, D. mixup: beyond empirical risk minimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations (OpenReview.net, 2018).

  62. Ester, M. et al. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In KDD Vol. 96 (eds Simoudis, E. et al.) 226–231 (AAAI, 1996).

  63. Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. & McIntosh, J. R. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using imod. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Meng, E. C. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: tools for structure building and analysis. Protein Sci. 32, e4792 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Kelley, R. et al. Toward community-driven visual proteomics with large-scale cryo-electron tomography of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Mol. Cell 86, 213–230 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2025.11.029 (2026).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Chang, Y.-T. et al. Cytoplasmic ribosomes on mitochondria alter the local membrane environment for protein import. J. Cell Biol. 224, e202407110 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Tegunov, D. & Cramer, P. Real-time cryo-electron microscopy data preprocessing with warp. Nat. Methods 16, 1146–1152 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Wagner, F. R. et al. Preparing samples from whole cells using focused-ion-beam milling for cryo-electron tomography. Nat. Protoc. 15, 2041–2070 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Tang, G. et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38–46 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Peck, A. et al. Lessons learned from a Kaggle challenge for particle picking in cryo-electron tomography. Nat. Methods 23, 1908–1916 (2026).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Gubins, I. et al. Classification in cryo-electron tomograms. Eurographics Workshop on 3D Object Retrieval https://doi.org/10.2312/3dor.20191061 (2019).

  73. Peck, A. et al. A realistic phantom dataset for benchmarking cryo-ET data annotation. Nat. Methods 22, 1819–1823 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-025-02800-5 (2025).

  74. Luo, Z., & Wang, S., CZII - 2nd Place Solution. Kaggle https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/czii-cryo-et-object-identification/writeups/luoziqian-lion-2nd-place-solution (accessed 17 November 2025).

  75. Ouertani, Y., Ouertani, E., Mehdi, W. & Souid, A., CZII - 5th Place Solution. Kaggle https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/czii-cryo-et-object-identification/writeups/youssef-ouertani-5th-place-solution (accessed 17 November 2025).

  76. Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K. & Dollár, P. Focal loss for dense object detection. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision 2980–2988 (IEEE, 2017).

  77. Cianfrocco, M. A., Lahiri, I., DiMaio, F. & Leschziner, A. E. cryoEM-cloud-tools: a software platform to deploy and manage cryo-EM jobs in the cloud. J. Struct. Biol. 203, 230–235 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Adaixo, R. et al. I. Cryo-EM structure of native human thyroglobulin. Nat. Commun. 13, 61 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Amari, S.-I. Backpropagation and stochastic gradient descent method. Neurocomputing 5, 185–196 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Ketkar, N. & Ketkar, N. in Deep learning with Python: A Hands-On Introduction 113–132 (Apress, 2017).

  81. Cryo et 1st place solution. Kaggle https://www.kaggle.com/code/christofhenkel/cryo-et-1st-place-solution?scriptVersionId=223259615 (accessed 17 November 2025).

  82. 7-model-6TTA-T4x2-patch-norm-v2. Kaggle https://www.kaggle.com/code/luoziqian/7-model-6tta-t4x2-patch-norm-v2/notebook?scriptVersionId=220452693 (accessed 17 November 2025).

  83. inference_script. Kaggle https://www.kaggle.com/code/youssefouertani/inference-script (accessed 17 November 2025).

  84. Myronenko, A. 3D MRI brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularization. In Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries (eds Crimi, A. et al.) 311–320 (Springer, 2019)

  85. Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Kohl, S. A. A., Petersen, J. & Maier-Hein, K. H. nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat. Methods 18, 203–211 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In Third International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Bengio, Y. & LeCun, Y.) (2015).

  87. Çiçek, Ö., Abdulkadir, A., Lienkamp, S. S., Brox, T. & Ronneberger, O. 3D U-Net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (eds Ourselin, S. et al.) (Springer, 2016).

  88. Chen, H., Dou, Q., Yu, L., Qin, J. & Heng, P.-A. VoxResNet: deep voxelwise residual networks for volumetric brain segmentation. NeuroImage 170, 446–455 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Li, Y. et al. Whole brain segmentation with full volume neural network. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 93, 101991 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Gibson, E. et al. Automatic multi-organ segmentation on abdominal CT with dense V-networks. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 1822–1834 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Zhou, Z., Siddiquee, M. M. R., Tajbakhsh, N. & Liang, J. UNet++: a nested U-net architecture for medical image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39, 1856–1867 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Salehi, S. S. M., Erdogmus, D. & Gholipour, A. Tversky loss function for image segmentation using 3D fully convolutional deep networks. In International Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (eds Wang, Q. et al.) 379–387 (Springer, 2017).

  93. Loshchilov, I. & Hutter, F. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In International Conference on Learning Representations (OpenReview.net, 2019).

  94. Liang, Y. et al. Datasets associated with RobPicker: a meta learning framework for robust identification of macromolecules in cryo-electron tomograms. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22238302 (2026).

  95. Liang, Y. et al. Source code associated with RobPicker. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22261457 (2026).


注意转载授权 · 阅读原文

来源:Nature · Machine Learning 主题 · nature.com

引用原文

Nature · Machine Learning 主题. RobPicker: a meta-learning framework for robust identification of macromolecules in cryo-electron tomograms[EB/OL]. (2026-11-04)[访问日期]. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-026-03250-3.